Sunday, November 17, 2013

Sister Mary Ignatius Explains it All for You and Diversity

The character of Sister Mary of in Christopher Durang's Sister Mary Ignatius explains it all for you is particularly apt to our current discussion of diversity. As somewhat obviously alluded to in the title, Sister Mary is a devout Catholic nun. We learn to our horror at the outset of the play about Mary's views, which is staged in the form of a question/answer lecture she is giving to a group: the audience. "What exactly went on in Sodom? Who asked me this question? I'm going to talk about Sodom a bit. To answer your question, Sodom is where they committed acts of homosexuality and bestiality in the Old Testament, and God, infuriated by this, destroyed them all in one fell swoop. Modern day Sodoms are New York City, San Francisco, Amsterdam, Los Angeles,... well, basically anywhere where the population is over 50,000." As one can readily see, Sister Mary has an incredibly. . . unique and specific set of ideals concerning the modern world. She believes that one way of thinking, one lifestyle, is appropriate and innately "right". She allows no room to sway from her "perfect" path, and anyone who does is immediately written off as a sinner who will from thence burn in hell. In fact, she keeps an ongoing list of people whom she believes will end up there. A pupil of her's, Thomas, reads it aloud, the list including men and woman such as Brooke Shields and Mick Jagger. Sister Mary seems to believe that all diversity need be quashed in the hope for a contrite, Christian World of "sinless" behavior. No room is left for anything creative or unique in her quest for salvation. The image of perfection she attempts to instill in her pupils terrifies them all, whom are silenced. She not only destroys any hope the could have of forming a positive religious perspective, but also their ability to become individuals. Her students at that age would resemble Pecola from The Bluest Eye, who finds herself longing for the image of perfection that society has imprinted on her, and unable to defend herself in any way. 

 The effects of her tyrannical teaching is evidenced when a group of Sister Mary's students visit her. Each of the students had her in grade school, and each in turn has his or her own story of how they had been tormented. At the outset, the Sister has no idea of their intentions. The students told her that they were there as a sort of reunion that she herself had requested. They soon ambush her, using the Sister as a source of blame for all of their misdeeds and misfortunes, including rape and spousal abuse. For the latter case, Sister Mary states that his abuses are "venial sins, which can be forgiven with an act of contrition". The others however, whom have had abortions, illegitimate children, or are homosexual, are simply "bad people". Rather than attempting to accept her former students for their different lifestyles, she chooses to label them abominations, thus destroying any hope for catharsis between herself and them.

At the climax of the play, one of the students pulls a gun on Sister Mary. At this point, the audience expects her to either be killed or to have a change of heart in order to save herself. However, she pulls out her own gun from beneath her skirts and shoots the other woman, and the homosexual man for good measure. At one point she even has Thomas hold the gun on another of the group. In Sister Mary's mind, she has not committed an unforgivable sin, as they would only have done further wrong anyway. There is no room in her now openly maniacal mind for other points of view or any lifestyle different from her own. Thus, the play concludes, in utter horror. What we can glean from this in regards to diversity is that it is something we must accept about the nature of humanity. Others will think differently than us, and attempting to block out these views will leave us immovable and bigoted, willing to commit murder to sustain our righteous beliefs. I suppose, in the end, two more deaths add but a small percentage to the longstanding tradition of religion's ability breed violence, in opposition to its very teachings.

The Bob Bullock Museum and Diversity

There were multitudinous exhibits regarding diversity in the Bob Bullock Museum. The first of which struck me was on the topic of woman in Texas gaining the right to vote in elections. On the plaque entitled "Woman Win the Vote", it states that "The Constitution of 1876 banned "idiots, imbeciles, paupers, and felons" were prohibited from woman, and that "Woman. . . were not even mentioned." This struck me as incredible, that woman in the state of Texas at this time weren't even considered on the level of "idiots and imbeciles". However, the woman in Texas did not take this issue lying down, and campaigned for decades for woman's suffrage, to eventual success.

Another exhibit which struck me as interesting was one "All for One and One for All" which talked about LULAC, or "the League of United Latin American Citizens." According to this exhibit, LULAC was "the first nationwide Mexican American civil rights organization." In a state that historically had been extremely racist and conservative, I was inspired by the fact that this organization developed in Corpus Christi. It spoke volumes about the nature of diversity in Texas at the time, who has always been and ever shall be heavily influenced in culture and in population by Mexican and Mexican-Americans. The question remains, however, whether or not we heed the needs of these peoples.

an image of the first held LULAC meeting

A third exhibit which explained most expressly the origins of the sheer volume of diversity in Texas was entitled "A Hundred Origins, One New Hope". The plaque for this small part of the all but labeled "Diversity Area" explained that "'To live well in Texas' was the hope of thousands of immigrants who flocked to Texas . . . seeking economic opportunity and political freedom." Texas at this time was a beacon for the American dream. As such, countless men and woman of all manner of race and religion rushed to the newly prosperous land. Their descendants help to make up the vast numbers of diverse peoples Texas holds within itself.


One exhibit which astounded me was called "Fly Girls in Texas". The plaque accompanying stated that, "Because of a shortage of male pilots, the Woman Airforce Service Pilots (WASPs) was formed in 1943 to ferry military planes, deliver cargo and passengers, and test aircraft." Why do more people not know of this? It happened in Texas for God's sake! I had never known that there were female pilots in the military during WWII, much less that they were trained here. It seems to me that more should know of these unsung heroes, whom in service defended their country with valor to equal their male counterparts. Why is such diversity not talked more of at this time? It is commonly known that woman took up vacant industry, but not that they flew! A still predominantly male profession in the hands of woman at the outset! What a happy thought indeed.



Wednesday, November 13, 2013

P2 First Run: Ahhh, Music


The Language of the Soul
         “Without music life would be a mistake.”[2] What a powerful, potent expression. In my opinion, music is the emotive glue that holds every being together. It can make us laugh and cry at once, with no idea why. Music has the power to make us feel. Feel what? Anything and everything, all at once. It is a most contradictorily simplistic notion, one that is difficult to express. Yet we all know what others mean when they speak of a certain piece of music that gave them chills or hit them in the gut like a bullet piercing the Kevlar of their Emotion-Proof Vest. Music is universal, yet extremely personal. Each of us can hear a piece of music differently, yet all of us in some sense are affected. For these reasons and many others, music is my passion.
            Grant it, I am a very passionate person, and thus claim a multitude of other obsessions. I am overwhelmed by the act of learning (which almost became my subject for this essay), and the inspired creativity it can enact. The way a person lights up when they realize the significance of a piece of knowledge. Learning is something we all can love, in some shape or form. In this way it is like music. However, why I choose music as that ultimate, defining passion in my life is because it is the purest expression of what passion really is: perfect emotion, wordless communication. It fills the void where words and even knowledge fail. One cannot describe a color in words, but Stevie Ray Vaughan’s guitar can make me feel as blue or as red or as green as a filtered light in a grimy New Orleans jazz club.
            Although I know that my ardent love affair with music began at a very young age, I cannot trace it back to a specific moment or source. It is an aspect of myself as familiar as an appendage or a cognitive language. In truth, it probably slipped into me around the same time as verbal communication would have. I would have been exposed to it in equal measure. My parents were and are music fanatics, and one cannot be in my home for long without hearing someone burst into song. Rushing through those early developmental stages of life in this climate, I am told I would bounce in my Bouncy-Saucer to the beat of whatever song was playing. Whether this is entirely true, I know not. Perhaps I was simply bobbing and happened along the beat every once in a while. I certainly like to think it was true, if for the entertaining image alone.
Some of my earliest memories as a child revolve around music. The most lasting of these occurred one morning with my father as he drove with me to church. I had recently taken notice of the fact that he was perpetually singing one tune or another. I asked him why, to which he promptly replied, “Well, because I’m happy, bud.” This struck a chord in me, no pun intended. From that point on, music was associated with happiness and happy memories. It took on as well a mystical quality. To a boy, anything his father acknowledges as great are thereafter put on a pedestal. So it was with music.
             Others flashes of the discombobulated color and noise that serve as our childhood memories revolve around the subject. My mother has always loved musicals and classical movies, and thus I was brought up hearing Singin’ in the Rain and Que Sera, Sera from the Man Who Knew too much. My grandfather would sing “You are my Sunshine” to me as a child. Many of these recollections I had never connected to my passion for music until recently. Yet now I see the significance: music has simply always held a positive connotation.
             As I grew, my musical preferences molded into personal taste. Varied over time, this palate has progressed from Screamo in those angst ridden years of preadolescence to the soulful, aggressive blues of Dan Auerbach and Jack White; to the jaggedly raw, impassioned lyricism of Marcus Mumford; and the quiet, simple honesty of the Avett Brothers and Citizen Cope. Some of these artists still inspire me at each listen, while others remind me of painful memories I’d rather forget. Either way, the music remains, imprinted in staves upon my mind. Certain lyrics remain red-hot in memory, as well as do the lives of those who created it. “You don't need anybody to tell you who you are or what you are. You are what you are![3]. . . “My music fights against the system that teaches to live and die.”[4]
                                                          [5]                                                          Bob Marley of course, author of the latter quote above.

At some point I also realized that while hearing music would in itself leave me awestruck, the creation of it could feed me. I sang and eventually picked up guitar, eager to somehow give back to what had given me so much. That doesn’t make much logical sense. It . . . just seemed a sin not to try creating my own interpretations. I thought somehow, maybe, that others could be touched by what I created, just as I had been inspired. I daydreamed about one day having a band, how COOL that would be! I wanted to be that front man on stage, kicking out footlights and smashing guitars. Although this dream has not yet come to fruition in that sense, I did as much in music as a student as possible. I felt that in some small way my actions had maybe inspired someone. There was an instance, for example, wherein a man whom had recently lost his wife to cancer, and came to me after I had performed in my high school production of Les Miserables. He told me that the finale of that show had given him an image of what he hoped heaven would be like. The experience still gives me chills in recollection. I was so very humbled, to think that a man in such pain could somehow take solace in what we had performed.
Hugh Jackman. He played Jean Valjean in the movie portrayal of Les Mis, and is one of my favorite actors. What a badass.

I suppose my explanation is all very well and good, but in the words of Professor J. Gilbert McAllister, “so what? . . . What difference does it make?[7] What does it matter?  Does any of this really matter if I don’t then use the gifts I have been given for the benefit of others? Is this the specific gift bestowed upon me for that purpose? In all honesty, to this final question I have no response. I ask it of myself every day, never any closer to an answer. Of late, I have decided, it seems, that the answer is no. The snarling dogs of reason and logic encircling me, I chose to drop my music major, telling myself that, “I’d never truly make it. I’d end up bitter and unsuccessful, wishing I’d become a lawyer or professor.” This seems sound in reasoning, even still. But then, where has my happiness gone? My cup is no longer filled, soul no longer sure. I debate transferring to Belmont University in Nashville, to pursue music and a major in Music Business. I long to be enveloped by music again. Could I find another passion to feed upon, or is this my reason for being? And yet, the purpose of this essay is not a personal, existential battle, but the aforementioned question. So what?
            The future that I have always wanted-- desperately so-- has nothing in truth to do with monetary reward or large-scale success. To me, the greatest impact any one being can have on the world is to inspire another. It can be a hundred thousand people, or one small child. It matters little. To some the world we live in is arduous, unhappy, and filled with suffering. Yet inspiration can make life glorious in scope and meaning. If your actions can move another to trudge one more day through the mire, to see life as those with inspiration do, then you have obtained success.
            Bearing this in mind, I feel that there are a multitude of ways I could help people through music. Even without making it my career. For the sake of argument, I will choose to imagine that I decide to make my way into the music industry. In five years, I want to see myself on some sort of stage, be it large or small. The setting is in reality unimportant. I would like to have written music of my own, or possibly to have a group with whom I write. I see myself playing this music in a setting intimate enough for me to connect with an audience. I would love the opportunity to create music with those around me organically. Simply allowing music to grow from playing together creates something beautiful, and artists such as Bob Dylan were known for coming up with their best records in this fashion. “He just started strummin’ and we jumped in after about two or four bars. . . There’s no overdubbing. There’s no patching up. . . What you heard is what we did.”[8]
The ability to create such a situation would be an attempt to inspire. I feel that playing music for others would become a service. A way for me to give back to others with those gifts that I possess. I would not wish to do so for personal vanity or gain, but so that others may be moved by what I have to say. This in turn would serve the somewhat more selfish notion of helping answer what I consider life’s difficult questions. We are all here, therefore have something to live for, but what I am here to live for? For what purpose was I given life? If I could somehow find the answers, I feel that these truths would “set me free”. Art is a way for humanity to do just that, and music especially is an outward cry for answers.
Music is an avenue through which we explore each other and ourselves. It is the bursting forth of those emotions we cannot hope to describe. It inspires us in ways not much else can. Therefore to me it would be the greatest achievement to somehow do this with my own music and talents. To leave behind such enduring remembrance of what I stood for could mean that even after I am gone, someone may still be encouraged by what I experienced and subsequently created. That is the torch I would leave behind. A message of understanding and inspiration. Life is not an easy task, but can be beautiful, if one only stops to listen.
I know not whether I will amount to these ends. Possibly I will follow a completely separate path, find some other passion to feed my soul. It could be children, a family, and a normal life. Maybe I really will become a lawyer, or a professor. These options seem no less viable, important, or worthy. They certainly can be avenues through which to help and lead others. Music seems simply to bring such helpfulness from another source: a different way, but no less beneficial to others. At least one would hope. No matter what I decide, I elieve that in my future I will use my life and gifts to make others’ lives a little happier, and a little easier. These ends met, I’ll consider myself a Fortunate Son.

WITH QUOTES: 2043                                                    
WITHOUT QUOTES: 1887




[1] DMCA, "HD Wallpaper." Last modified 2013. Accessed November 14, 2013. https://webtaj.com/cool-music-14809.html.

[2] Friedrich, Nietzsche. Good Reads Inc., "Quotable Quote." Last modified November 2013. Accessed November 14, 2013. http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/4590-without-music-life-would-be-a-mistake.

[3] Partridge, Elizabeth. John Lennon: All I Want is the truth. New York: Penguin Group, 2005.

[4] Marley, Bob. BrainyQuote.com, "Brainy Quote." Last modified 2013. Accessed November 14, 2013. http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/b/bobmarley383272.html.

[5] Billoard, "Bob Marley." Last modified 2013. Accessed November 14, 2013. http://www.billboard.com/artist/293509/bob-marley.

[6] iamtwixietops, . Baggage Counter, "Les Miserables (Movie Review)." Last modified January 18, 2013. Accessed November 14, 2013. http://www.iamtwixietops.com/2013/01/les-miserables-movie-review.html.

[7] Oliver, Chad. Some Blues for a TrioComposition and World Literaure. Edited by Jerome Bump. Austin: Jenn's Copy and Binding, 2013.

[8] Howard, Sounes. The Life of Bob Dylan. New York: Grove Press, 2001.

Monday, November 11, 2013

Fun Home Part II

The most striking aspect to me of this narrative was the number of contrasting images throughout the work., the apparent existence of things due entirely to their opposition. For example, the narrator's efforts to become "mannish" because of her father's lack of masculinity, Bechdel's desire to express herself articulately because of her father's inability to do so, Bruce's apparently redeeming qualities that were wrought from his generally tyrannical behavior. Even the landscape of Bechdel's parents' marriage, which she describes as intensely toxic, is made so because of the constant reminders of what could have been. While her father makes consistently silent forays into guilt-ridden homosexual encounters, her mother participates in plays and visits her friends in New York. This inherently contradictory nature, in fact, is highlighted in a play Bechdel's mother participates in, The Importance of Being Earnest. As anyone who has read the play knows, it is humorous due to its incongruity, its contradictory turn of phrase. This contradiction of perceptions of what is important resonates with Bechdel, whom has lived her life in such a manner, from her parents' unhappy marriage to her sexual confusion and finally orientation. "Now to minor matters. Are your parents living?" (157) This quote from Earnest holds especially potent meaning, as it mirrors her later disjointed mirth at the death of her father. "He got-- HA HA HA-- hit by a truck!". . . the idea that my vital, passionate father was decomposing in a grave was ridiculous." (229) What Bechdel failed to realize at the time is that the mirth created by Wilde's contradiction  was wrought from its truthfulness in society.
What Bechdel seems to be ultimately conveying here is that the positive aspects of her life were made clear exactly because of their opposition. To quote one very cliche platitude, "One cannot have darkness without the light"; there can be no life without death. This is extremely evident in her relationship with her father. toward the end of her narrative, Bechdel explains a certain number of redeeming qualities she found in her father, happy memories she has of him, such as her correlation with him and her love of literature. It is evidenced specifically in the Ulysses episode. "On our final evening, a family friend remarked admiringly to Joan on the close relationship between my father and me. 'It's really unnatural. Err. . . I mean, unusual.'" (225) Although Bruce Bechdel's traits had in many ways caused his daughter to take opposite stances in compensation for him, this would not have been possible without his example. Like Earnest, the contradiction seems morbidly humorous in its truth. Bruce made his daughter the way she was by giving her an example of what she didn't want for herself. In my opinion, the discovery of the self is a systematic process of eliminating those things which we dislike or even abhor in our society. This drive led Bechdel to be loud where her father was silent, to speak where her father was inarticulate. Yet in the end, she did love her father. Her misplaced guilt over his death helped her develop, and to write this novel. Her love and hatred of her father, her empathy and disgust for his decisions, and their distant closeness, molded her into the woman she became. In the words of Tyrion Lannister, a renowned father hater, "Life is full of these little ironies." I believe Ms. Bechdel would heartily agree.


Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Fun Home Part I

An overwhelming theme that pervades throughout Fun Home, as well as the Bluest Eye and the Student essays, are the detrimental effects that a parent's attitude toward themselves-- and consequently the way in which they present themselves to their children-- can have on their children and family dynamic. In the student essays, for example, the parents of Johnny Lee, in an attempt to create for their children the ideal American lifestyle they were never able to have, treat him with a strict, austere coldness that then leads to mental torment, after they find out about his sexual orientation. Furthermore, the shame that Johnny's father felt at having the same tendencies led to an even more violent reaction of feigned disgust, for he could not tell his wife the truth. "I don't want the faggot. I hate faggot son." (Anthology, 562) Obviously, he was experiencing "internalized homophobia. . . a fear of same-sex tendencies within oneself [which] can lead to suppression." (Anthology, 37) These internalized feelings of shame and suppression led Johnny to lose all respect for his father, thus estranging him from his family. Similarly, in the Bluest Eye, Cholly's lifelong feelings of shame and humiliation from white people, as well as his inability to understand the ties of childhood and marriage, lead him to sexually and otherwise physically abuse his children. This is brought on by an inability to express his emotion, which had caused in his family, especially his daughter Pecola, a feeling of utter worthlessness and ugliness.



These situations are very similar to that of Alison and her father Bruce in Fun Home. Due to the internalized homophobia and shame felt by Bruce, he turns to anything in his life that he can control, in order to distract him from his current unhappiness. Bruce puts more stock in perfecting the Bechdel's house than he does in raising his family, and the Bechdel's home become a cold and detached place to grow up. "I grew to resent the way my father treated his furniture like children, and his children like furniture." (Bechdel, 14) While Bruce whiled away his time in distraction of his own imperfection, he abused his children and had homosexual affairs with students. He also continually attempted to make his daughter more feminine, as she attempted to make up for his femininity, and he wished to downgrade her masculine tendencies. Eventually, Alison is only able to connect to her family through the use of literary reference, as she felt that her life with them had been a continual lie. Her father lived in constant pretense, and thus blurred the lines for her of what was reality and what was fiction in her memory. "Perhaps affectation can be so thoroughing, so authentic in its details, that it stops being pretense. . . and becomes, for all practical purposes, reality." (Bechdel, 60)
Alison grows up to become  emotionally detached, who tries to feel vicariously through others. These tendencies are directly resultant from the quietly desperate dance her parents and family employed to communicate, and the falsity of their day-to-day lives. As in each of these three relationships, the inability of a parent, specifically a father, to cope with some aspect of themselves, leads to a family dynamic that is abusive, cold, and neglectful to their children.

Monday, November 4, 2013

The Bluest Eye Part III

The final Third of Morrison's the Bluest Eye seems to focus its attention most upon the effects that abuse has on the human psyche, specifically the cyclical nature of abuse. Furthermore, it sheds light on the evils of societal prejudice and marginalization, what is worthy and unworthy of attention from society. In this section we are given insight into Cholly's life and past, and a previously despised character becomes somewhat human. "He remembered just how she held it-- clumsy-like, in three fingers, but with so much affection. . . And then the tears rushed down his cheeks, to make a bouquet under his chin." (Morrison, 156) Cholly was abandoned by all the family he'd ever had, spent the majority of his youth and into his adult life alone and uninhibited, then was thrust into a life of marriage. He could not comprehend his plight, and in his incomprehension turned to what he could understand, violence and abuse. This was the universal language for many families. They all attempted to grasp at happiness, which only seemed to exist in life unobtainable to them, and in their shame and their helplessness they punished those people whom it was within their power to punish: husbands their wives, wives their children. This theme can also be seen in the student essays that we read, as the parents, whom were immigrants, attempted to comprehend the alien culture around them, could not do so, and punished their children with rigidity of the few things they understood, such as religion and the importance of education. In a way, all of these parents simply want what they cannot have, and helplessly search for release of this miserable truth. The release mostly came in the abuse, verbal or physical, of their children, such as in the case of Cholly and Pauline or the Asian American family and their gay son.

In the quest for understanding, people often take pleasure is the knowledge that someone out there is worse off than them. This leads to marginalization of the worth of certain members of society. In this narrative, Pecola, in her vulnerability, become this scapegoat for human emotion. "And all of our beauty, which was hers first and which she gave to us. All of us--all who knew her-- felt so wholesome after we cleaned ourselves on her. . . we honed our egos on her, padded our characters with her frailty, and yawned in teh fantasy of our strength." (Morrison, 203) The people of Pecola's community used her to keep at bay their own inadequacies, the victim of societal subjugation. Just as white people as a whole used black people as their own to victimize, their own to bully and intimidate to make themselves feel better. The point Morrison seems to make is that it is human nature to take pleasure in comparing ourselves to others whom are beneath us. We all strengthen our self image by finding a member of society to pity and be the object of our revulsion. Abuse and marginalization of the worth of others is a never ending cycle of hatred and hypocrisy. We are all affected, but none so much as the weak, as those who love the people that hate them.


Friday, November 1, 2013

NSC Museum

In regard to the placement and structure of the museum, it's pretty obvious to the observer that it displays the dominance of man over the surrounding nature. The Museum stands as a monolith on the top of a huge hill, surrounded all below by forested areas, and the statue of the horses directly beneath adjacent to the road. Of course, part of its landscape as such is meant to pay homage to nature and animals in general, as the NSC does inside its walls. But it is strictly in a sense of appreciation of those things humans find as beneath them. It seems an arrogant notion, in this sense, to attempt to objectively appreciate something we feel superior to or above. Rather than this homage to nature making us equal with it, the museum seems purposefully built as if to denote human superiority.

If I were my spirit animal, seeing what the homo sapiens had done in order to research and understand my species, I would feel appalled, bewildered, and confused. If humans wanted so desperately to learn about me and my habits, why would they kill members of my species, my brothers and sisters, in order to do so. Seeing other wolves that had been stuffed and put on display would fill me with an immense sorrow, that they had died for so petty a cause. Wolves are meant to live freely, with other members of their pack, not to die simply to become empty shells or empirical study. I would become distraught and angry at how callous humans could be in taking the lives of others, being who have as much right to this earth as them. I would run as far away as I could from this barbaric species.
I would think that the human race was a stupid, insensitive, narcissistic race of beings. They only care for themselves, and nothing for the lives of others. They claim in their slaughter of beasts to be helping create awareness for all life, yet take life in the doing of the thing. This makes no sense, and seems counter-productive to their so called aims. They seem to be obsesses with possession, taking for their own anything that seems worthy or valuable, leaving destruction in their wake and nothing left for the rest of us. I would wish that humans had never existed, that their stone halls had never been constructed, to hallow the lives which they themselves took from innocent beings.